Sunday, March 29, 2020
Julius Ceasar Essays - Cultural Depictions Of Julius Caesar
  Julius Ceasar      In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and  Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar,  each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a  somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway  the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating  that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in  Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and  cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar.  The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding  emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators. Brutus  seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He  begins his speech with Romans, countrymen ..., appealing  to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who, he later  says, will benefit as freeman with Caesar's death. This shows  that Brutus knows how to lure the crowd, appealing to their  better judgement as Romans. He declares that he is an  honorable man, and tells them that he will let them judge the  validity of his claims. That is, he will allow the truth to speak  for itself. This encourages the crowd to believe him, as an  honorable man. He says that he wants them to know the  facts; Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses  that you may the better judge. Sharing information with the  people is flattering and it almost guarantees acceptance. He  gets their sympathy by saying that he loved Caesar, daring  the people to find anyone who loved Caesar more. Brutus  declares that he never wronged Caesar, that he cried for  Caesar's love, was happy for his greatness, honored him for  his courage, but had to kill him because of Caesar's  ambition. He says that the reason for killing Caesar was his  great love for Rome. He justifies his actions by saying that he  loved Caesar but, Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I  loved Rome more. He then asks rhetorically if the people  would want to live their lives as slaves under Caesar's rule or  would they prefer to live as freemen with Caesar dead. To  anyone insulted by his speech he wonders if, as Romans  who love their freedom, they could be offended or reject  what he, Brutus, says. He poses the question, Who is here  so base that would be a bondman? He stresses the point,  repeating the line, If any, speak, for him have I offended. I  pause for a reply., allows them to respond to his rhetorical  questions, giving them an even greater sense that he cares  about them and their opinions. They can only respond,   None, Brutus, none. That is, none are offended, they do not  disagree or argue with his words or his actions. Mark  Antony's eulogy utilizes a different approach. He starts out  by addressing the crowd as Friends because he wants to  come to them as a friend rather than a ruler trying to gain  power. He then says, I come to bury Caesar, not to praise  him., thus he can ease in praises of Caesar without the  crowd stopping him. He sounds very sincere when he says,  The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious....  For Brutus is an honorable man. He repeats that statement  three more times becoming increasingly sarcastic, saying  finally, Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and sure he was  an honorable man. Since the people responded positively to  Brutus' speech, Antony could not insult Brutus' honesty in a  direct manner. Yet, Antony disproves Caesar's ambition  with three examples. One is when he gave the ransom of  captives to the public treasury and not his own, another  when he cried with the poor people, and finally when he  refused the kingship that Antony offered him, three times.  Anyone who was ambitious would never have done any  such things. Antony says, I speak not to disprove what  Brutus spoke. , but that is exactly what he does. Antony is  using a dramatic effect on the people, first by entering on the  stage with the body of Caesar, and at the end stating that his  heart is still with the body of Caesar, ending his speech  weeping. In justifying Caesar and disproving Brutus, the  people see Antony as a potential successor to Caesar. They  are swayed to him by his dramatics, his underhanded way of  making a point, his repetition, and compelling proof of  Caesar's concern. He is able to get the people to question  the rightness of killing Caesar. He has planted doubt in the  people's minds, in all areas except that he, Antony, is, poor  soul, an honorable. The difference between the eulogies  shows us the importance of style of speech. Both try to  appeal to the people, and both use repetition, but    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.